football-tips


Contents
Home
Bookshop
Football
Newsletter
Issue 6
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 5
Ashes 2005 - Preview
Big Brother 2005: the story so far..
Betting on Cricket In-Running
Forum Decorum
Developing a Ratings System, Part 2
Review of Scottish Football Season 2005 - Part II
Interview with Zonker, Part 3
Issue 1
Issue 15
Issue 17
Issue 12
Issue 19
Issue 8
Issue 10
Issue 9
Issue 7
Issue 4
Issue 11
Issue 16
Issue 18
Issue 13
Issue 14
Horse Racing
Other Sports
Tools
Poker
Betting Theory

Recent Forum Posts
Football Data
- Can anybody point me to good f...

Asian Handicaps
- Hello. I am a new user. Can pl...

Statistical regression system suggestions
- Hi, long time no see! Hope eve...

Formal study of statistics
- It's very interesting - and ed...


 

online-betting Developing a Rating System 2

Mr OneMore continues his guide

Direct and Indirect Comparisons

Well, I hope you're managing to collect some data. We'll look at how to organise and analyse that information a bit later, but first I want to talk to you about pair-wise direct and indirect comparison techniques.

Wow, that sounds complicated - I don't think I've ever heard of those before.

Perhaps not using those terms, though I'm sure you use those very techniques every single time you place a bet!

Let's take an example from Boxing. Suppose you're looking forward to investing in a fight about to take place between Mr Aggresive and Mr Basher. You'd probably want to see if they've ever fought before. Perhaps you find out that just last week Mr A knocked out Mr B in the 1st Round. Well, I'm not a boxing expert, but that's probably very good information to know. That is an example of a pair-wise direct comparison between Mr A and Mr B.

OK - that's obvious enough. I'd use that information myself, and I'd certainly want a rating system to use that kind of data. So what about indirect comparison?

Well, let's say that later on the same card Mr Crusher and Mr Demolition are going to have a professional disagreement, but that they've never fought before. That means there just is no way of directly comparing each other's strengths through a previous performance. We'll have to find a way of comparing them indirectly.

Aha - I see this now. This is like a form-line. Perhaps previously they have both introduced themselves to the same boxer, at different times of course!

Yes. Maybe we know that Mr C gave Mr A a thorough pasting, but also that Mr A walked all over Mr D. Although they've never met previously, I'd suspect that Mr C has the upper hand over Mr D.

I understand this, but it's all getting very complicated. What, with all these Mr Aggressive's and thorough pastings…

But I'll admit that you're right. That is the way I like to look into a bet, by looking at the form. But I certainly don't look into all the possible direct and indirect comparisons before I make a bet.

Maybe - but perhaps you would like to, and that's the kind of thing that attracts some people into automating the whole process. By using a ratings system, what we're attempting to do is use all of that kind of information in a precise mathematical way.

In addition, if you can find a good metric, that is if you can find a way of putting a number to phrases like 'a thorough pasting', or 'walked all over', then you've potentially got a very good ratings system.

OK - so the whole process is really just a way of trying to formalise what I do anyway when I make a bet. But there's much more to it when I make my own selections, for instance I might suspect that Mr A didn't really try against Mr C, and that Mr D is a southpaw and that…

Hang on!! All I'm going to say right now is that there are a number of ways of dealing with these problems, some quite effective, others less so. But it's fair to say that at the end of the day, your rating is just going to be a measure of something that you have defined. It will never be a perfect measure or predictor of sporting performance. Though if you construct your own ratings, using sound mathematical techniques, then they can certainly act as a good guide. You will know what they can do, and what they can't. You will also have the benefit of being able to back-test your theories and have a certain confidence in any future bets.

Read other installments:

 Part One| Part Three

football-betting Got a question or comment about Developing a Rating System? Why not post it in our forum?

Latest Web News
Cricket
Pakistan keeps Champions Trophy
- September's ICC Champions Trop...

Flintoff not ready to bat at six
- Andrew Flintoff will not push ...

Dilshan makes history with appeal
- Sri Lanka's Tillakaratne Dilsh...

Notts near victory over Yorkshire
- Nottinghamshire leave Yorkshir...

Glamorgan end wait for Pro40 win
- Half-centuries from Mark Walla...


Lower Scottish Leagues
Two midfielders join Livi squad
- Livingston manager Roberto Lan...

Basso in signing talks with Livi
- Hearts goalkeeper Anthony Bass...

SFL-bound Annan sign four more
- Annan bring three former playe...

Airdrie snap up former Celt Lynch
- Kenny Black has added former C...

East Fife strike to sign Crawford
- Former Scotland striker Stevie...


Big Brother
DS:BB News Extra - Day 50
- The latest news snippets and g...

Group deliberates double eviction
- Maysoon says a double eviction...

Dale, Rex and Bex pelted with eggs
- A mass egg-throwing event take...

Luke upset by Bex's Mohamed kiss
- Luke tells Bex that watching h...

Bex and Sara refuse to kiss for Rex
- Rex dares Sara and Rebecca to ...


Links Relevant to this Topic

Aibet
Artificial Intelligence ratings system

Massey's Ratings Site
Ratings & Predictions

© Punters Paradise. Material may not be used without express permission.