| Home | Forum | Newsletter | Football | Horse-Racing | Other Sports | Poker | Betting Theory | Free Tools | Bookshop |
| Contents Recent Forum Posts |
|
| Punter | Weekly Stakes |
Yield |
Income |
| Andy Amateur | £20 |
-5% |
(£1) |
| Barry Beginner | £100 |
1% |
£2 |
| Charlie Cleverclogs | £500 |
2% |
£10 |
| Dave Disciplined | £1,000 |
3% |
£30 |
| Ernie Eke-Outaliving | £20,000 |
5% |
£1,000 |
| Frankie Fancyhouseandcar | £50,000 |
7% |
£3,500 |
| Glenn Godcomplex | £100,000 |
10% |
£10,000 |
Of course in the real world, they have to pay commission, so they don't realise this amount of profit. To calculate their net profit, we need to look at how commission is calculated. We only pay commission on our winnings, so we need to look at how much winnings we have in each case. This will depend on the odds at which we bet. At short odds we will expect more winners, on each of which we will pay commission. If, on the other hand, we are betting at longer odds we would expect fewer wins.
If we take the generic case, we can assume we have X% winners, which means we have (1-X)% losers. If are betting at decimal odds of Y, our returns, pre-commision are given by:
Returns(no commission)= (X)(Y-1)-(1-X) = (XY-X-1+X)=XY-1
When we add commission, we have to pay commission of Z% (the commision rate) on our winnings. The equation above becomes:
Returns(with commision)= (1-Z)(X)(Y-1)-(1-X) =XY-1-ZXY+ZX
Let A = Returns with no commision, and B = Returns with commision
Our effective tax rate = 1-B/A = 1-(XY-1-ZXY+ZX)/(XY-1) = 1-1+(ZXY-ZX)/(XY-1)
= ZX(Y-1)/(XY-1)
This means that our effective 'tax rate' will depend linearly on the commission rate - i.e. double the commission rate means we pay double the tax. You might be thinking - "so what - I already knew that!".
"He is in fact paying 17.2% tax on his profits at a 1% commision rate, when betting at evens."
Well, maybe you did - maybe you didn't, but it is instructive to see just what that tax rate is. Lets take our example of Dave Disciplined above. He is in fact paying 17.2% tax on his profits at a 1% commision rate, when betting at evens. Were he to go t0 long odds, e.g. 10/1, he would be paying 31.2% tax. The implication is that if he was to transfer his business to a higher commission exchange (e.g. 3%) he would be making hardly any profit at all - he'd be paying 93.6% of his gross profit in taxes (i.e. commission) to the exchange operator!
The graph below shows the effective tax rates for EACH 1% commission, at various values of edge (the edge being calculated in a 'fair', i.e. 0% commission, market):
Conclusions
The above graph has a logarithmic scale, so values at the high end (i.e. above 10% are more compressed, e.g. the value for the effective tax rate when betting at 10-1, with 5% yield is approximately 20% FOR EACH percentage of commision paid. Thus, betting at Betfairs current maximum rate on most markets (5%), would result in almost no profit!
It looks like Ernie Eke-Outaliving might have to do more of his business at BackAndLay if he wants to stay afloat! Even Glenn will think twice about betting his long-shots at Betfair if he realises he is paying about 45% tax!
BBCThe Theory of Optimal Betting Spreads
The theory of optimal betting spreads for
the game of Blackjack has a sound mathematical basis
Theory of Gambling
Gambling book reviews
The Layman's Guide to Probability
An in-depth but easily readable guide on probability theory
Betting Traders
Education for the betting revolution
| Home | Forum | Newsletter | Football | Horse-Racing | Other Sports | Poker | Betting Theory | Free Tools | Bookshop |